<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Atlantic BT &#187; search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/tag/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing and Web Development in Raleigh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Small Features and the User Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/small-features-and-the-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/small-features-and-the-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wirtanen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/?p=2983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The smallest of features can negatively impact the user experience on a website if not designed properly. For example, I recently encountered a small issue in Gmail when I searched my email. The issue was very salient because I had to spend a few seconds thinking about how the feature worked&#8230; After searching your Gmail, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smallest of features can negatively impact the user experience on a website if not designed properly. For example, I recently encountered a small issue in Gmail when I searched my email. The issue was very salient because I had to spend a few seconds thinking about how the feature worked&#8230;</p>
<h2>After searching your Gmail, have you ever wanted to turn off the highlighting?</h2>
<p>The power of search is one of the things that makes Gmail one of the best email solutions available.</p>
<p>Have you ever searched for an email (using a keyword) and noticed that the keywords you used were highlighted in the resulting email? This feature is very useful and mimics traditional search engine behavior, where keywords are bolded in a couple sentences from each result.</p>
<p>The highlighting can actually be controlled by using the two icons that appear in the top-right of the search results page:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2984" title="Top-right of Gmail when searching" src="http://d1rvlzmuzboe2s.cloudfront.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/gmail_topright.png" alt="Top-right of Gmail when searching" width="251" height="108" /></p>
<p>Unfortunately, these icons are identical, so the user has no idea which one to click. The left highlighter icon will actually turn on highlighting (only if it&#8217;s off), and the right highlighter icon will turn off highlighting (only if it&#8217;s on). The design is very salient because it doesn&#8217;t match the user&#8217;s mental model, which is primarily developed from previous experience (with computers and in the real-world).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a design that should match a user&#8217;s mental model, because it&#8217;s very similar to an on/off button:</p>
<h3>On:</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2986" title="Mockup of Gmail Highlighter Icon - On State" src="http://d1rvlzmuzboe2s.cloudfront.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/gmail_topright_on.png" alt="Mockup of Gmail Highlighter Icon - On State" width="251" height="108" /></p>
<h3>Off:</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2987" title="Mockup of Gmail Highlighter Icon - Off State" src="http://d1rvlzmuzboe2s.cloudfront.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/gmail_topright_off.png" alt="Mockup of Gmail Highlighter Icon - Off State" width="251" height="108" /></p>
<h2>Little Big Details</h2>
<p>This may seem like a very small issue, but imagine how many people must have encountered it. Small details like this should not be overlooked. The blog <a href="http://littlebigdetails.com/">Little Big Details</a> does a great job at demonstrating how small features can make a big difference. One of my favorite posts was their demonstration that <a href="http://littlebigdetails.com/post/2925192794/chrome-when-closing-tabs-in-chrome-the-position">the position of the close button stays the same in Chrome</a>, allowing users to effortlessly close more than one tab. Small details like that go unnoticed by the majority of users, which is actually a good thing. When users have a frustration-free experience, they can focus more on their goals (which is why they&#8217;re on the site in the first place!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/small-features-and-the-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Diagnose Website Indexing Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/diagnose-website-indexing-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/diagnose-website-indexing-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing/Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is amazing how many times I get asked questions like, &#8220;Why can&#8217;t I find my website when I search my company name?&#8221; or &#8220;Why is Google not finding all of the pages on my site?.&#8221;  So I thought I would write a post that explains reasons why you may have issues with your website [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing how many times I get asked questions like, &#8220;<em>Why can&#8217;t I find my website when I search my company name?</em>&#8221; or &#8220;<em>Why is Google not finding all of the pages on my site?</em>.&#8221;  So I thought I would write a post that explains reasons why you may have issues with your website getting properly indexed by search engines.</p>
<p><strong>Check your Robots.txt file:</strong> The problem may be as simple as your <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots_exclusion_standard">robots.txt file</a> is disallowing search engines from crawling your site.  Type <em>websiteurl.com/robots.txt</em> to see if you are currently disallowing search engines.  If you see something like this …</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-721 alignleft wp-img-mid-left" title="robots-txt-screenshot" src="http://d1rvlzmuzboe2s.cloudfront.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/robots-txt-screenshot.png" alt="robots-txt-screenshot" width="218" height="67" /></p>
<p>you are actually telling search engines not to index your site.  By simply removing the &#8221; / &#8221; you will allow search engines to start indexing your site. The &#8221; / &#8221; is representative of your site&#8217;s root path. So that essentially means that you are telling search engines when they visit <em>http://www.yourcompany.com</em> to NOT index your site.</p>
<p>You may also be restricting search engines in your source code.  Go to <em>&#8216;View&#8217;</em> in your web browser and view the <em>&#8216;Page Source&#8217;</em> or CTRL+U.  Do a &#8220;Find&#8221; for <code> &lt;META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW"&gt;</code>.  If you see <code>"NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW"</code>, as you can imagine it tells search engines not to index or follow the page.  Simply remove that piece of code, to allow it to be indexed.  Be sure to check all pages in question, since this code may be on some or all of your pages.<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-726 wp-img-mid-right" title="navigation" src="http://d1rvlzmuzboe2s.cloudfront.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/navigation.png" alt="navigation" width="278" height="239" /></p>
<p><strong>Check your Site Structure: </strong> For large websites you may have a lot of directories in your site.  If your directories go 3, 4, or even 5 directories deep off the root level, it may be hard for search engines to crawl those inner pages.  Try keeping your directories as close to the root directory as possible.</p>
<p><strong>Check your Site Navigation: </strong> Your website navigation may not be search engine friendly, meaning search engines are unable to follow the interior pages through your navigation.  If your navigation is developed using flash or programmed in javascript, it may inhibit search engines to access your interior pages.  To fix this issue, have your navigation programmed using <code>a href</code> links.  If you do not want to re-program your navigation, try adding footer text links at the bottom of each page.  This will give the search engines a second way of accessing your interior pages.</p>
<p><strong>Check your CMS:</strong> If you are pulling in content dynamically through a <acronym title="Content Management System">CMS</acronym> or some sort of database, search engines may have a problem indexing your content. Here is an example of the differences between dynamic and static urls.</p>
<h3>Dynamic URL</h3>
<p><em><span><span class="defaultfont">http://www.websiteurl.com/forums/thread.php?threadid=12345&amp;sort=date</span></span></em></p>
<h3>Search Friendly Static URL</h3>
<p><em>http://www.websiteurl.com/forums/indexing-issues.html</em></p>
<p>The problem with dynamic <dfn title="The global address of documents and other resources on the World Wide Web. (source: webopedia)">URL</dfn>s, is that these URLs do not exist.  They pull in content on the fly, based on what the user requests.  If the URLs do not exist, search engines will not be able to find these pages and index them.  In order to fix this URL issue, use a URL re-writer to modify the URL so it creates static looking pages from dynamic pages.  This will give the impression to search engines that these are static pages.  It will also help with <abbr title="Search Engine Optimization">SEO</abbr>, if you use keyword-rich URLs.  For some CMS&#8217;s, it may be hard to find a URL re-writer off the shelf.  Almost all of the mainstream CMS&#8217;s like <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a> and <a href="http://wf.klevo.sk/">Wildflower</a> all have URL re-writers you can use.</p>
<p><strong>Google Website Penalty: </strong> I recently wrote a post on <a href="http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/how-to-detect-when-google-penalizes-your-website/">how to detect when Google penalizes your website</a>.  If you notice that your site is not being crawled by search engines, it could possibly be that search engines have banned or penalized your website and they are not adding your site to their index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticbt.com/blog/diagnose-website-indexing-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 301/335 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via d1rvlzmuzboe2s.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.atlanticbt.com @ 2012-02-03 22:11:10 -->
